Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Riding Shotgun

By Jocelyn SelimMay 1, 2002 5:00 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

If you don't buckle up, you are putting more than yourself at risk: Passengers in the rear who don't wear a seat belt also pose a serious threat to those up front. Epidemiologist Masao Ichikawa of the University of Tokyo reached this conclusion after studying 100,000 vehicle crashes logged by Japan's traffic registry. His analysis shows that almost 80 percent of front-seat deaths could have been avoided if riders in the back had also belted up.

In head-on collisions, Ichikawa found, belted front-seat riders were more than six times as likely to be killed if there were unbuckled riders in the back. The fatality rate in these cases was similar to that for front-seat passengers who were not wearing a seat belt at all. "It's not that surprising. If a car that is traveling 50 kilometers [30 miles] per hour is stopped dead, 150 pounds in the backseat are going to be thrown into the front with an impact strong enough to be deadly. There's no reason seat belt laws shouldn't include the backseat," Ichikawa says. Only 14 states extend their seat belt laws to passengers in the rear.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In