Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Prints Are King

The fear of terrorism has opened new areas for growth in the security industry.

By Alex StoneNovember 25, 2004 6:00 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Antiterror spending has inspired a mad dash to perfect cutting-edge devices such as iris scanners and facial recognition systems, yet the most effective way to identify people is also one of the most familiar: fingerprinting. “Right now it’s the best thing going,” says mathematician Charles Wilson, who led a two-year study at the National Institute of Standards and Technology on the efficacy of fingerprint-matching equipment. Using data from the Department of Homeland Security’s catalog of more than 68 million prints, Wilson’s team determined that the latest readers—which scan a person’s prints directly, without using ink—are 99.6 percent accurate. Facial ID systems are 90 percent accurate at best. What’s more, when jacked into the homeland security database, fingerprinting fails to tag suspicious individuals just once every 1,000 times.

The Patriot Act now requires airport security to screen all incoming non–U.S. citizens (excluding Mexicans and Canadians) by scanning each person’s digitized photograph as well as his or her fingerprints. But the prints really do all the work, Wilson says.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 50%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In