Last week, I pointed to a Facebook post by Sarah Palin that was just bonkers about climate change and "ClimateGate." And I linked to a thorough refutation of it, by Adam Siegel. This post is simply to say that despite Siegel's Herculean efforts, essentially the same item now turns up as an op-ed in The Washington Post. I'm sure Carl Zimmer will have much to say about fact-checking and the Post's op-ed page; but hey, it's just presenting the "other side" on climate change, right? I mean, so what if Sarah Palin asserts that the current warming is just part of a natural cycle, or confuses climate with weather--showing not only ignorance of basic climate science, but embracing positions quite contrary to accepted scientific knowledge. So what--because Republicans need their science too, and op-ed pages exist to let all sides to articulate their point of view--to say what they want to say and what they deeply feel, and do their best to attract lots of fans. Just like Facebook does.
Sarah Palin's Bogus Climate Arguments Graduate From Facebook to the Washington Post
Explore how Sarah Palin's take on climate change reflects common misconceptions contrary to accepted scientific knowledge.
Written byChris Mooney
| 1 min read
Newsletter
Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
Meet the Author
Related Topics
More on Discover
Stay Curious
SubscribeTo The Magazine
Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.
Subscribe












