Hunting Big Game Speeds Evolution of Shrinking Species

By Nina Bai
Jan 14, 2009 6:27 PMNov 5, 2019 5:26 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The human penchant for animals of impressive size has left some of the most hunted species smaller and weaker. A new study finds that human-induced selection, through activities like hunting and fishing, is having a profound effect on the evolution of many species.

"Human-harvested organisms are the fastest-changing organisms yet observed in the wild" [National Geographic News], said lead researcher Chris Darimont.

The pattern of loss to human predation like hunting or harvesting is opposite to what occurs in nature or even in agriculture [The New York Times]; instead of survival of the fittest, human predation encourages survival of the scrawniest.

In nature,

predators typically take “the newly born or the nearly dead,” Dr. Darimont said [The New York Times],because healthy individuals are more difficult and dangerous to catch. But human hunters and gatherers

target the biggest and strongest individuals. To find out how human predation affects species evolution, researchers

examined previously documented, hunting-induced changes across 29 species in 40 locations, including commercially targeted fish, bighorn sheep, caribou, and several marine animals such as limpets and snails. Two plant species were also included in the analysis: Himalayan snow lotus and American ginseng [National Geographic News]. The hunted species were compared with 25 species that are not hunted but subject to other human interference and another

20 species that face only "natural" pressures, such as climate, competition for resources, or animal predators [National Geographic News].

All three categories included some rapid modifications, so "comparing the databases was kind of a showdown," Darimont says [ScienceNOW Daily News].

Since trophy hunting removes the strongest individuals from the gene pool, the breeding populations left behind become progressively smaller and younger. Researchers are concerned that these younger populations may not be able to reproduce as well. Darimont says that in fish especially, "younger and smaller breeders produce less offspring, and this jeopardizes the ability of prey species to recover after harvest."

Reporting in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [subscription required], the researchers found that hunted species won the showdown—evolving 50 percent faster than those facing other human interference and three times faster than those not affected by human activities. Species exploited by humans showed a general trend of evolving smaller body size and breeding at a younger age.

The body and horn sizes of bighorn sheep, for example, have declined by about 20 percent in the past three decades as a result of human hunting. Atlantic cod on the east coast of Canada now breed at five years of age instead of six—a shift that has occurred in only two decades [National Geographic News].

Such shifts may also imperil other species that have evolved alongside the targeted animals, either as predators, prey, or competitors, Darimont added [National Geographic News].

Related Content: 80beats: Elephant-Lovers Worry About Controversial Ivory Auctions in Africa 80beats: To Save the Fish in the Sea, Give Fishers a Financial Share DISCOVER: Fish Farming Threatens Wild Salmon

Image: flickr / jensweb

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.