Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

On Education And 'Science Literacy'

Explore the meaning of science literacy and debate how it's defined—classroom learning or natural curiosity?

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

While I'm preparing for Saturday's education panel, let's venture back to a related topic discussed here over the past several weeks. I'm curious to find out how our new readers feel about the term 'science literacy'...

Do you think it's something learned in the classroom or acquired by way of natural curiosity and keen intellect? Is a student well versed in facts about photosynthesis and planetary orbits more scientifically 'literate' than the poor test taker who spends afternoons reading about dinosaurs and searching for fossils in her backyard? In other words, how might we best define the term--even before assessing it? Comments

on earlier threads suggest folks mostly agree that many heavily cited surveys using standard pop-quiz parameters do not convey much useful information about society at large. So can we ever measure this term satisfactorily? Furthermore, when does science literacy matter most?

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles