Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Mind

The Man With Uncrossed Eyes

NeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticApril 14, 2013 5:56 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

"GB" is a 28 year old man with a curious condition: his optic nerves are in the wrong place. Most people have an optic chiasm, a crossroads where half of the signals from each eye cross over the midline, in such a way that each half of the brain gets information from one side of space. GB, however, was born with achiasma - the absence of this crossover. It's an extremely rare disorder in humans, although it's more common in some breeds of animals, such as Belgian sheepdogs. Here's GB and a normal brain for comparison:

achiasma.png

Canadian neurologists Davies-Thompson and colleagues describe GB in a new paper using functional neuroimaging to work out how his brain is organized. In the absence of a left-right crossover, all of the signals from GB's left eye end up in his left visual cortex, and vice versa. But the question was, how does the brain make sense of it? Normally, remember, each half of the cortex corresponds to half our visual field. But in GB's brain, each half has to cope with the whole visual field - twice as much space (even though it's getting no more signals than normal.) It turns out that the two halves of space overlap in GB's visual cortex, as these fMRI results show:

achiasma1.png

The four colours represent the four quarters of the visual field, and the brain blobs that light up in response to them. Although the bottom and the top of space are separately represented, as they normally are, there's complete overlap between the areas that respond to bottom-left and bottom-right stimulation, and likewise top-left and top-right. It's possible that they are separately represented at a smaller scale, however. Despite this, GB's vision was remarkably good - he scored around 20/80 vision, one quarter as accurate as a typical person. This is a fascinating case report, and vision neuroscientists will find much to ponder here. Still, what I'd love to know is how does it feel to have overlapping representations of the two sides of space? Does everything seem to be mirrored vertically? Does GB find it easier to tell objects apart when they're above and below the other, compared to side-to-side?

rb2_large_white.png

Davies-Thompson, J., Scheel, M., Jane Lanyon, L., & Sinclair Barton, J. (2013). Functional organisation of visual pathways in a patient with no optic chiasm Neuropsychologia DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.014

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In