Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Mind

Is "Dendritic Learning" How The Brain Works?

NeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticMay 11, 2018 8:12 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

A new paper in ACS Chemical Neuroscience pulls no punches in claiming that most of what we know about the neuroscience of learning is wrong: Dendritic Learning as a Paradigm Shift in Brain Learning According to authors Shira Sardi and colleagues, the prevailing view which is that learning takes place in the synapses is mistaken. Instead, they say, 'dendritic learning' is how brain cells really store information. If a neuron is a tree, the dendrites are the branches, while the synapses are the leaves on the ends of those branches. Here's how Sardi et al. explain their new theory:

sardi_dendritic.png

On the left we see the idea of synaptic learning, which proposes that each synapse can independently adjust its strength. On the right, we have dendritic learning, the idea that each neuron only has a small number of adjustable units, corresponding to the main dendritic branches. The evidence for dendritic learning, Sardi et al. say, comes from experiments using cultured neurons in which they found that a) some neurons are more likely to fire when stimulated in certain places, suggesting that dendrites can vary in their excitability and b) that these (presumed) dendritic excitability levels are plastic (they can 'learn'.) Sardi et al. conclude that their new model is nothing less than a Copernican revolution in neuroscience:

Copernicus was the first to articulate loudly that the earth revolves around the sun and not vice versa...“I guess something is wrong”, Copernicus said to himself as he swam against conventional wisdom... "Hebb’s theory [of synaptic learning] that has been so deeply rooted in the scientific world for 70 years seems to be wrong", I have told my students.

Hmm. It's a nice idea, but it's very preliminary and I find it quite hard to believe. For one thing, Sardi et al. have not shown that synaptic learning doesn't happen. At best they have shown that dendritic learning also happens. To me the problem with dendritic learning as an exclusive mechanism of learning is that it leaves each neuron with only two or three 'degrees' of information capacity. A neuron can have thousands of synapses and if they are all independent, that's a lot of potential information storage. Whereas if plasticity is confined to the primary dendrites, this massively reduces the information capacity of each neuron. I'd need to see a lot more evidence to convince me of this, so I don't think Copernicus has returned to earth just yet.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In