Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Study: Patriot Act Made Anthrax Research 5-6x More Expensive

80beatsBy Andrew MosemanMay 11, 2010 10:50 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The USA Patriot Act and the Bioterrorism Preparedness Act, both enacted not long after the 9/11 attacks, contained measures to make it harder for anybody to get their hands on the kind of pathogens one might need to launch a bioterror attack. There was just one problem: The rules also slowed down and constrained our own scientists' abilities to learn about those pathogens, according to a study out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. To be specific, lead researcher Elizabeth Casman found while there was a touch of good news—the laws didn't appear to deter new scientists from entering the field—the major effect of those acts has been to make research on ebola virus and anthrax much more expensive, and much slower.

The researchers did find an increase in the total number of papers published. But before the laws, 17 anthrax papers appeared per million dollars of funding. With the restrictions, only three papers appeared per million dollars of funding. For ebola, the numbers dropped from 14 to six papers per million dollars. Figures for the control stayed the same [Scientific American].

In other words, a scientific paper on anthrax became five or six times more expensive, and a paper on ebola twice as expensive. And a lot of the problem is simply the exhaustive record-keeping required.

The laws' new regulations govern the exhaustive documentation of the transportation, guarding, and use of select agents. As a result, they are burying researchers studying select agents with administrative duties, Casman noted. Researchers to whom Casman spoke "all complained of the paperwork," she said. "A lot of it, they just find overwhelming" [The Scientist].

One might argue that the paperwork headaches are worth it if they keep our samples of deadly pathogens secure (especially after an affair like the Bruce Ivins case

, in which the longtime Army researcher was convicted for was the lead suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks before he died in 2008 in an apparent suicide

). But biodefense policy expert Vickie Sutton told Nature

that the Patriot Bioterrorism Preparedness acts aren't securing out lab supplies of ebola and anthrax—they're just slowing down our own knowledge about them.

For example, regulations require researchers to create an inventory of each sample of a select agent and to document any changes. A missing test tube would draw immediate attention from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, says Sutton. But the system does nothing to prevent the use of samples withdrawn from a live culture to seed a new culture. "You could every day be giving this agent out to someone," she says. "It's nonsense" [Nature].

Related Content: 80beats: Bioterror Attack Likely in the Next 5 Years, Congressional Report Says

80beats: Army Biodefense Lab Shuts Down To Check if Anything Is Missing

80beats: Army Researcher’s Alleged Anthrax Attack Raises Concerns Over Biodefense Labs

DISCOVER: Infectious Defense

asks whether a determined bioterrorist can be stopped Image: U.S. Army

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 50%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In