Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Goodbye to Mammograms


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Ask Veronica James to describe a mammogram, and she won't mince words. "They're dreadful," she replies. "Imagine your breast being pulled forward and squashed between two plates. It's one thing for people who have no other problem, but for people who've just had radiation therapy, it is excruciating." For that reason James, a biophysicist at the Australian National University in Canberra, is hoping that screening women for breast cancer may one day involve nothing more than plucking a single pubic hair. She's found that hair from breast cancer patients has a different molecular structure than hair from women without the disease.

By bouncing X-rays off pubic hair samples--which are less likely to be damaged from perming or dyeing--James found that hair from women with breast cancer produced a distinctive set of rings in the pattern of scattered X-rays. She believes that the alteration may be due to structural changes in the "glue" that binds hair filaments. Although she can't predict when a simple hair test will be available, its benefits, if effective at catching all cases, would be profound. Mammograms miss about 25 percent of breast cancers in women in their forties and 10 percent in women over 50.

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 75%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In