Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


A More Scientific Obesity Test Says: It's Even Worse Than You Think

The widely used Body Mass Index (BMI) is crude and should be replaced; here's a more modern suggestion.

By Andrew GrantAugust 21, 2012 5:00 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Obesity is a major public health threat, yet doctors assess it using a 200-year-old comparison of weight and height called the Body Mass Index, or BMI. In April, researchers Nirav Shah and Eric Braverman revealed BMI’s flaws. They studied 1,400 people and compared their BMI with a definitive measure: body fat percentage, determined by X-ray scans. BMI correctly predicted whether a person was obese (25 percent fat for men, 30 percent for women) just three-fifths of the time, and it was particularly inaccurate for women. The researchers propose changing the BMI obesity threshold (now at 30) to 24 for women, 28 for men. They also advise people to consider a body fat scan and a blood test for the hunger-suppressing hormone leptin.

The Consequences

There are 116 million women in the United States.

• According to BMI guidelines, 41.3 million (35.5%) are obese.

• Based on a new study, at least 74.5 million (64.1%) should be deemed obese.

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 50%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In