Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

Fuzzy Math: Impartial Jury

A bad jury or judge? Might as well flip a coin.

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Let’s say you’ve been put on trial—you’re innocent, of course—and that a perverse exercise in probability theory will decide your fate.

Each juror will choose whether or not to vote in favor of your conviction by flipping a coin: If it lands on heads, then it’s off with yours; if the coin lands on tails, then you are spared. But you have a choice. You can either select a three-person jury composed entirely of coin flippers—best out of three determines the verdict—or you can have the judge flip a single coin for the decision. Which scenario should your legal counsel request?

The truth is that it’s a trick question, since comparing the probabilities reveals that your odds of winning are a straight fifty-fifty shot in either case! You may as well let the judge decide and save three people from jury duty.

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles