: In a much-ignored speech last week (not ignored by Grist), Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) argued that the U.S. could become less vulnerable to spiking oil prices if we used less of it (surprise!). The crux of the talk was a graph he showed of our country's estimated petroleum imports, and specifically, the significant change inprojection between 2008 and 2011 (blue and red lines above). Our now-declining gas and oil imports are in part a result of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. How the Heck:
What's the News
Our petroleum imports are projected to decline because the Energy Act included strategic changes to biofuel and fuel efficiency policies. For example, automakers are required to increase fleetwide gas mileage to 35 miles per gallon by 2020 and more money is being funneled into biofuel production.
As Bingaman said in his speech, the act will save the U.S. billions of oil barrels---more than the 23 billion that we now have in U.S. proven oil reserves.
The bottom line is that by including more biofuels into our gasoline and supporting alternative energies, we'll require less petroleum and thereby rely less on the petrostates. The concept is simple, but it carries a wallop once you actually see the graph.
What's the Context:
This entire process was a bi-partisan initiative. Part of the Democratic Party's 100-Hour Plan, the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act was introduced to the House by Nick Rahall and President Bush signed it into law as part of his "Twenty in Ten" challenge.
The graph and its projection is a non-partisan product because it's created by the EIA, which is charged with disseminating "independent and impartial energy information."
From offshore drilling to false promises of energy independence, 80beats and Cosmic Variance has fossil-fuel news covered.
While Discoblog explores inventive ways of getting petroleum from plastics.
Not So Fast: Some green-tech writers think the EIA's predictions are more fiction than fact. According to Chris Nelder at Green Chip Stocks, the EIA's predictions often "present a picture of the future that looks like a continuation of the best parts of the past, with none of the bad parts." The assumption that our oil imports will keep on declining hinges partly on technologies that haven't been invented yet and the hope that all the policies included in the Energy Act come to fruition. The only thing you can't argue against is that petroleum demands right now are much lower than we had expected, thanks in due part to the Energy Act. What's more, the economy has largely sputtered since 2008, which tends to tamp down demand for energy. The graph might be more valuable if it showed oil consumption per unit of economic activity. Image: EIA
