Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

The Arsenic Eliminator

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

When the Bush administration declined to tighten standards for arsenic in drinking water, its argument focused on economics: Limiting the heavy metal to 10 parts per billion, as the World Health Organization recommends, would cost too much. Xiaoguang Meng begs to differ. He and colleague George Korfiatis, both at Stevens Institute of Technology in New Jersey, have developed a filtration system cheap enough for villagers in Bangladesh, where groundwater is naturally contaminated with arsenic.

Meng's process requires just two buckets, some sand, and a tea-bag-sized packet of iron-based powder. Pour tainted water into one bucket, along with the powder, and stir. Arsenic bonds to the iron and coagulates out of the water. After a minute, pour the mix into a second bucket filled with 4 inches of sand. The sand filters out the arsenic-iron particles, leaving the water pure. In yearlong pilot tests with 300 Bangladeshi families, Meng measured arsenic concentrations in well water as high as 648 parts per billion. The bucket filter reduced that to 10 parts per billion, at a cost of about $2 a year per family.

placeholder

Photo by Kathy Cacicedo.

Even 50 parts per billion, the legal limit in the United States, may carry a 1-in-100 lifetime risk of cancer, according to a recent National Academy of Sciences study. Some American water treatment plants are moving beyond federal rules and testing a scaled-up version of the Stevens decontamination system. "European countries already use the WHO standard, so why can't we? It doesn't make sense," Meng says.

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In