Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

Stomping on the Trees

Explore the impact of environmental protection laws and pollution control spending on effective cleanups and wildlife habitats.

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

By the Environmental Protection Agency’s own estimate, the nation now spends 2.5 percent of its gross national product on pollution control. Regardless of whether, in absolute terms, that is too much money or too little, even environmental advocates concede that much of it is money not well spent, a consequence of overly rigid and wasteful laws. The Superfund hazardous waste law, for instance, generates billions of dollars in legal fees each year as companies fight to avoid paying for costly cleanups that sometimes have little or no effect on the environment. Recently regulators tried to use the Clean Water Act to force San Diego to spend $3 billion to upgrade a sewage treatment plant, even though scientists said that it would not make the Pacific Ocean environs significantly cleaner.

Newt Gingrich may have been exaggerating last February when he declared that the environmental movement has totally broken down, but he ...

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles