Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

How Far We Haven't Come

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Check out this oped in the Tennessean by a petroleum geologist and energy consultant named Gerry Calhoun:

Are we worrying about the wrong type of climate change? Perhaps impending cold, rather than global warming, represents the real danger.

Yup--it's that bad. Reading the oped, you'd think we hadn't learned anything about the various causes of climate change--natural, anthropogenic, and how much each is contributing--during the last several decades. Calhoun doesn't even mention the conclusions of the IPCC on this score. But he says things like this:

So what can we expect — 1 degree hotter or 3 degrees colder? Climate models can be constructed to prove either outcome, a situation that should warn us about the predictive accuracy of models.

Rather than there identifying better or worse models--or wiser still, finding a consensus range for the best models--all models are to be tossed out, apparently. It's probably a fool's errand to track and refute these sorts of things in local papers. But still, it's a staggering reminder just how far we haven't come in winning broader acceptance of modern climate science.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In