Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Hold the Revolution?

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Earlier this year, Slate ran a biotechnology-related story with this catchy headline and subhead:

The Green Monster: Could Frankenfoods be good for the Environment?

The once fractious public debate over GMOs (genetically modified organisms) appears to have exhausted itself (no one bothered to comment on the Slate story). Some think the debate is over, you know, kind of like climate change. (Hold the pitchforks, I'm just having some ironic fun.) Personally, I think the issue is much more complex than either the pro or con side let on. So what to make of this recent study in Science discussed by ecologist Garry Peterson over at Resilience Science? I don't know, but if I could just find a way to link it to hocky sticks or Anthony Watts, I bet I could get some people to think about it and maybe even write a sneering comment. UPDATE:

This recent piece in Yale Environment 360 is worth reading for additional context. And it's got shades of that other let-the-data-be-free controversy that is much more well known.

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In