Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Getting Serious about Adaptation

Collide-a-ScapeBy Keith KloorDecember 2, 2010 5:17 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The Economist explains why adaptation has long been marginalized in the climate debate:

The green pressure groups and politicians who have driven the debate on climate change have often been loath to see attention paid to adaptation, on the ground that the more people thought about it, the less motivated they would be to push ahead with emissions reduction. Talking about adaptation was for many years like farting at the dinner table, says an academic who has worked on adaptation over the past decade. Now that the world's appetite for emissions reduction has been revealed to be chronically weak, putting people off dinner is less of a problem.

The article is titled "Facing the Consequences," and its thrust is captured in the subtitle:

Global action is not going to stop climate change. The world needs to look harder at how to live with it.

Is that a conversation the climate concerned community is ready to have?

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In