Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Can Endangered Bluefin Tuna Be Saved by Fish Farming?

80beatsBy Joseph CalamiaAugust 31, 2010 2:43 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

bluefin.gif

Bluefin tuna--they're so delicious, they're on the brink of extinction. The human appetite for this majestic fish has spurred overfishing that has endangered the wild population, so researchers and aquaculture companies are trying to breed the fish in captivity. But so far bluefin tuna have proved very difficult to farm, since it's impossible to replicate their natural reproductive cycle--researchers think the fish travel hundreds of miles to their traditional spawning grounds. The best results so far have come from an Australian company that is using hormone injections to get the big fish to breed. Now researchers associated with a European project called Selfdott (an odd acronym for "self-sustained aquaculture and domestication of thunnus thynnus") say they can successfully raise fish in captivity without using hormones. The New York Timesreports that the first batch of fish, raised in floating cages, died after a matter of weeks or months, but researchers still think that with better food and parents more adjusted to captivity, the next group of fish will survive.

“If the results of this research can ultimately be commercialized, it can improve food supplies and contribute to economic growth and employment while also helping to ensure a sustainable management of bluefin tuna,” Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, the European Union’s commissioner for research, said this week. [New York Times]

Because the predator fish are high on the food chain, requiring lots of food (in the form of smaller fish) and many years to grow, environmentalists still aren't too keen on the aquaculture fix.

Tuna is one of the most environmentally punishing fish to farm, in part because the fish takes a decade or more to mature. During this time, the captive fish are fed massive amounts of smaller wild fish--an estimated 20 tons of food fish goes into each ton of tuna produced--so those prey species may become depleted in turn. The farms also produce high concentrations of fish waste, polluting the area around the farm, and can be breeding grounds for piscine diseases and parasites like sea lice. [Popular Science]

It would be better, some say, to eat fish lower on the food chain that require less resources. Saskia Richartz, an oceans and fisheries expert with the European unit of Greenpeace told The New York Times:

"[T]his is tantamount to breeding elephants in captivity for their ivory.” [The New York Times]

Related content: 80beats: In “Operation Blue Rage,” Sea Shepherd Activists Will Target Tuna Poachers 80beats: Bluefin Tuna Is Still on the Menu: Trade Ban Fails at International Summit 80beats: DNA Scanner Proves That NYC Sushi Contains Endangered Bluefin Tuna 80beats: Scientists Say Ban Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Trade–and Sushi Chefs Shudder 80beats: Are Fish Farms the Answer to World Hunger or a Blight on the Oceans?

Image: Wikimedia / OpenCage

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In