Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

Cultures & genes: Paleolithic to the Neolithic

Explore spatial linguistic variation and its impact on cultural distinctiveness through genetic and historical contexts.

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Spatial linguistic variationSpatial genetic variationTemporal linguistic variationTemporal genetic variation

PaleolithicVery highHighModerate-to-highModerate-to-low

NeolithicModerateModerate-to-lowModerateHigh

Bronze AgeModerate-to-lowLowModerateModerate-to-high

Iron AgeLowLowModerate-to-lowModerate

Modern AgeVery lowLowLowModerate-to-low

In the comments below I posited a scenario to explain a strange inference from a paper from a few years back, Sequencing of 50 Human Exomes Reveals Adaptation to High Altitude:

Population historical models were estimated (8) from the two-dimensional frequency spectrum of synonymous sites in the two populations.

The best-fitting model suggested that the Tibetan and Han populations diverged 2750 years ago

, with the Han population growing from a small initial size and the Tibetan population contracting from a large initial size (fig. S2). Migration was inferred from the Tibetan to the Han sample, with recent admixture in the opposite direction.

2,750 years would place the divergence of modern Tibetans and Chinese a few hundred years before Confucius. In fact, it would technically post-date the first historically attested Chinese ...

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles