The Sciences

NCBI ROFL: The efficacy of stethoscope placement when not in use: traditional versus "cool".

DiscoblogBy ncbi roflJul 14, 2011 11:00 PM
fig-1.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

It’s CMAJ week on NCBI ROFL! All this week we’ll be featuring articles from the Canadian Medical Association Journal’s holiday issues. Enjoy! "Objective: To determine whether the “cool” or circumcervical placement of the stethoscope when not in use is as efficacious as the traditional placement in terms of transfer time to the functional position. Methods: Measurement of time taken by 100 health care professionals in each group to transfer stethoscope to functional position. Results and interpretation: The cool group was much slower than the traditional group, despite their younger years. This wasted time could translate into a substantial financial burden on Canada's health care system."

Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Doctors on display: the evolution of television’s doctors.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: For some reason, med students don’t want to show their genitals in class.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Self-surgery: not for the faint of heart.

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ

!

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 70% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2022 Kalmbach Media Co.