Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

NCBI ROFL: The efficacy of stethoscope placement when not in use: traditional versus "cool".

DiscoblogBy ncbi roflJuly 15, 2011 4:00 AM
fig-1.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

It’s CMAJ week on NCBI ROFL! All this week we’ll be featuring articles from the Canadian Medical Association Journal’s holiday issues. Enjoy! "Objective: To determine whether the “cool” or circumcervical placement of the stethoscope when not in use is as efficacious as the traditional placement in terms of transfer time to the functional position. Methods: Measurement of time taken by 100 health care professionals in each group to transfer stethoscope to functional position. Results and interpretation: The cool group was much slower than the traditional group, despite their younger years. This wasted time could translate into a substantial financial burden on Canada's health care system."

stethoscope.png

Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Doctors on display: the evolution of television’s doctors.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: For some reason, med students don’t want to show their genitals in class.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Self-surgery: not for the faint of heart.

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ

!

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In