Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

NCBI ROFL: Liar, liar, pants on fire!

397715338_027bb7755b-199x300.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles. "Telling lies often requires creating a story about an experience or attitude that does not exist. As a result, false stories may be qualitatively different from true stories. The current project investigated the features of linguistic style that distinguish between true and false stories. In an analysis of five independent samples, a computer-based text analysis program correctly classified liars and truth-tellers at a rate of 67% when the topic was constant and a rate of 61% overall. Compared to truth-tellers, liars showed lower cognitive complexity, used fewer self-references and other-references, and used more negative emotion words." || |

lying_words.jpg

Photo: flickr/Brad Gillette

Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Proven tips for making your partner jealous. Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Why Facebook is ruining your marriage. Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Study proves cheating good for marriage. WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In