The Sciences

NCBI ROFL: Free-range maggots better for cleaning putrid wounds.

DiscoblogBy ncbi roflNov 16, 2010 6:00 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Maggot debridement therapy: free-range or contained? An in-vivo study. "OBJECTIVE: To determine which method of maggot debridement therapy--free-range or contained--is more effective for wound healing. METHODS: In vivo study of 64 patients with 69 chronic wounds that showed signs of gangrenous or necrotic tissue. Patients were treated with either free-range or contained maggot debridement therapy according to maggot availability, dressing difficulty, and physician preference. RESULTS: Significantly better outcomes were achieved with the free-range technique versus the contained technique (P = .028). With the free-range technique, the mean number of maggot applications and the total number of maggots per treatment were significantly lower than with the contained application technique (P = .028 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical in vivo study supports in vitro studies in which containment of maggots was found to reduce the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy."

Photo: flickr/gruntzooki Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Self-surgery: not for the faint of heart. Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Hijacking a plane flown by euthanized pigs: a beginner's manual. Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The mystery of the bottle cap in the knee. WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 70% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2022 Kalmbach Media Co.