Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Let 100 
Stories Bloom


Here is an honest look at the progression of science: provocative early results, long-sought confirmations, and many steps in the iterative process of testing theory against observation and vice versa.

By Corey S PowellFebruary 20, 2012 6:00 AM
corey.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Late last year, I spent an enlightening evening with Neil deGrasse Tyson—astrophysicist, director of the Hayden Planetarium, and science explainer extraordinaire. We were on a panel discussion about science and storytelling, sponsored by the Sloan Foundation and the Ensemble Studio Theatre in Manhattan, and Neil unleashed a broadside about the way research results are covered in the popular press. Each news report has to be a “breakthrough” that “changes everything,” he complained—as if scientists spend most of their time twiddling their thumbs until every once in a while one of them stands up and shouts “eureka!”

The issue you hold in your hands (or are reading online) is my retort to Neil. The 100 stories here capture scientific curiosity in all its stages: provocative early results, long-sought confirmations, and many steps in the iterative process of testing theory against observation and vice versa. Our #1 story of the year exemplifies science in action. Physicists at CERN, the huge European research center, were studying ghostly particles called neutrinos for signs that they can “oscillate” from one type of particle into another as they move. Along the way, the investigators found another, even stranger kind of behavior. The particles seemed to move faster than light, something that would turn physics upside down if confirmed.

Elsewhere in these pages, skeptics challenge a NASA researcher’s celebrated claim to have found microbes whose biochemistry is so strange they practically qualify as alien life. Now one of the skeptics is stirring up her own controversy because of the public way she has attempted to debunk the finding. Wonder what ever happened to the stunning promise of stem cell therapy? The research goes on, following a tortuous path past ethical, legal, and scientific hurdles. And then there is the invisibility cloak, a technology whose geek-chic factor makes it irresistible—if only the engineers can figure out how to make it practical. Quietly and methodically, they are making impressive progress .

What these stories have in common is a lack of tidy conclusions. They are instead celebrations of the marvelous middle: the open-ended process by which scientists chip away at mysteries, refine their techniques, and make the world look a little different than it did the day before.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In