Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Atheists Attack Atheist Article

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

As noted earlier, I've recently done a Playboy article that advances the case for an atheistic, scientific spirituality devoid of supernatural belief but not devoid of feeling. To my surprise, the piece is now being attackedfor being pro-religion. But if you read it, it's clearly about liberating us from religion, and says many of the same things that leading atheists like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris say about non-religious spirituality! On Al Jazeera, you may recall, Dawkins discussed the "frisson in the breast" that he feels when contemplating "the beauty of the universe, the complexity of life, the magnitude of space, the magnitude of geological time." He says this feeling could be called "spirituality"--but "I would be very concerned that it shouldn't be confused with supernaturalism." My article perpetrates no such confusion. It is clear throughout that we're talking about spirituality without religion, e.g., "a growing number of nonreligious researchers," "a prevalence of spirituality detached from traditional religion," "Einstein saw no reason to believe in a personal God or the supernatural," "[Darwin] ultimately concluded he would have to remain an agnostic with respect to God," etc. And most of all, this passage:

Therefore, rather than vanquishing religion, modern science might have helped to unleash the human spirit and free it from traditional religious constraints. The result? At least for some, the need for spiritual fulfillment can now be satisfied outside the context of supernatural creeds. And the sacred, which is the object of the spiritual quest, can now be found in nature and in a search for an understanding of it.

Thankfully there are some atheists who do see what I was saying--and its resonance: See here. Reading my article correctly, Camels with Hammers notes that it "effectively shows that atheistic spirituality and religiosity are possible without any need for the baggage of ungrounded belief." But as one e-correspondent pointed out, the coolest thing of all is...I've apparently gotten some people to read Playboy for the articles!!!

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In