Advertisement

The Hidden Complexity of the Olympics

Discover the decathlon scoring system and how it influences track and field events through complex number scores!

Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Chad laments that we don't hear that much about the decathlon any more, because Americans aren't really competitive. I also think it's a shame, because any sport in which your score can be a complex number deserves more attention. Yes, it's true. The decathlon combines ten different track and field events, so to come up with a final score we need some way to tally up all of the individual scores so that each event is of approximately equal importance. You know what that means: an equation. Let's imagine that you finish the 100 meter dash in 9.9 seconds. Then your score in that event, call it x, is x = 9.9. This corresponds to a number of points, calculated according to the following formulas:

Advertisement

points = α(x0-x)^β for track events, points = α(x-x0)^β for field events.

That's right -- power laws! With rather finely-tuned coefficients, although it's unclear whether they occur naturally in any compactification of string theory. The values of the parameters α, x0 and β are different for each of the ten events, as this helpful table lifted from Wikipedia shows:

Eventα

x0

βUnits

100 m25.437181.81seconds

Long Jump0.143542201.4centimeters

Shot Put51.391.51.05meters

High Jump0.8465751.42centimeters

400 m1.53775821.81seconds

110 m Hurdles 5.74352 28.5 1.92 seconds

Discus Throw12.9141.1meters

Pole Vault0.27971001.35centimeters

Javelin Throw10.1471.08meters

1500 m0.037684801.85seconds

The goal, of course, is to get the most points. Note that for track events, your goal is to get a low score x (running fast), so the formula involves (x0-x); in field events you want a high score (throwing far), so the formula is reversed, (x-x0). Don't ask me how they came up with those exponents β. You might think the mathematics consultants at the International Olympic Committee could tidy things up by just using an absolute value, |x-x0|^β. But those athletes are no dummies. If you did that, you could start getting great scores by doing really badly! Running the 100 meter dash in 100 seconds would give you 74,000 points, which is kind of unfair. (The world record is 8847.) However, there remains a lurking danger. What if I did run a 100-second 100 meter dash? Under the current system, my score would be an imaginary number! 61237.4 - 41616.9i, to be precise. I could then argue with perfect justification that the magnitude of my score, |61237.4 - 41616.9i |, is 74,000, and I should win. Even if we just took the real part, I come out ahead. And if those arguments didn't fly, I could fall back on the perfectly true claim that the complex plane is not uniquely ordered, and I at least deserve a tie. Don't be surprised if you see this strategy deployed, if not now, then certainly in 2012.

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

1 Free Article