The decline of Survivor

The American television show Survivor, a reality television phenomenon, faces a long-term ratings decline as it ages over ten years.

Written byRazib Khan
| 1 min read
Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

I just realized that the American television show Survivor is now over 10 years old. Though The Real World had been around for nearly ten years when it premiered in the spring of 2010, Survivor was what triggered the lift-off of the current generation of "reality television." I haven't watched it since season (series) two, so I was curious what was going on with it. It looks like it's been in long-term ratings decline. The host received a one year renewal on his contract early this year, instead of the two or four year contracts agreed to in the past. Here's the trend in terms of its ranking in the ratings:

And by millions of viewers:

Note the disjunction between the viewers who watched the premier, and those who watched the finale, on the first season. Survivor Borneo became a national phenomenon and built up momentum over the season. The second season, The Australian Outback, exhibited the opposite trend. The only outlier after those seasons is the All-Stars. Since season two it seems that the franchise has matured and is now slowly decaying into cultural and ratings irrelevance, though it's had a very long run.

Meet the Author

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe