Social Scientists & War

Explore why academic anthropologists opposed Pentagon's Human Terrain program despite its potential for cultural sensitivity.

Written byKeith Kloor
| 1 min read
Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

I just don't understand why academic anthropologists are so viscerally opposed to the Pentagon's Human Terrain program. If injecting cultural sensitivity into the military can defuse tensions and reduce conflict in a war zone, isn't that a good thing? I can appreciate the ethical concerns, but from what little I've followed on this, it seems that the profession's leading body isn't interested in working with the military to address those concerns. (There are also operational shortcomings but that's another issue.) The question Danger Room posed a few months back still stands unanswered:

Are there any conditions under which anthropologists can work with the military?

Meet the Author

Related Topics

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe