skip to main content

Scientists create first ever synthetic bacterium that looks like Craig Venter

A synthetic bacterium breakthrough has scientists divided, with ethical debates on the implications of genome manipulation igniting discussions.

Written byEd Yong
| 2 min read
Follow on GoogleGoogle News Preferred Source
Placeholder image

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

In a move that’s been hailed as one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs of the century, a group of scientists have created a synthetic bacterium that looks like Craig Venter. The team artificially synthesised a genome in the lab and inserted it into an empty bacterial cell, which promptly remodelled its outer wall into a picture of Venter’s face. “Before today, there had only been one genome in the world with the right sequence of nucleotides to encode my face,” said Venter, speaking from his secret volcano lair. “Now there are two, and I can’t help but think that things have greatly improved. “Of course, the ultimate goal is to build a creature with 100 heads, not unlike the mythical hydra, but where every head is my head. "Or, er, something about biofuels," he added. Other scientists warned that the ethical debates sparked by the discovery had only begun. Andrew McQueen from New York University said, “Imagine going for a walk in the park only to find that every bird in the trees has Craig’s face on it and they’re all looking at you.” “They’re not smiling either,” he added before curling up on the floor and crying quietly. While the research was widely reported as a major breakthrough, other newspapers were more critical, with one spokesperson saying, "He's basically just taken information from an existing source, copied it and reprinted it in another place. That's our f**king job!" Meanwhile, it transpired that Venter has coded a line from a James Joyce novel into his synthetic genome, a move that drew condemnation from America’s creationist groups, who didn’t understand what a novel was.

(For actual takes on this story, see a straight take in the Times, eight glowing reactions in Nature, a more reserved take in the New York Times that more closely mirrors my own feelings, and an excellent explanation of the new paper’s technical achievements, which are indeed substantial.)

//

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Meet the Author

Related Topics

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe