Mens' Odor Stresses Lab Mice, Which Could Skew Results

D-briefBy Carl EngelkingApr 29, 2014 10:23 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

A new study is wafting an odor of uncertainty over the results of prior experiments using lab rats and mice. Researchers have discovered that the scent of a human male significantly stresses the critters, an effect not seen in response to females. Researchers from McGill University in Montreal discovered that, in the presence of men, mice display a stress response equivalent to being placed in a confined space, such as a tube, for 15 minutes. The study is the first to systematically test this aspect of rodents’ response to their handlers. “Scientists whisper to each other at conferences that their rodent research subjects appear to be aware of their presence, and that this might affect the results of experiments, but this has never been directly demonstrated until now,” Jeffrey Mogil, a psychology professor at McGill who led the study, said in a statement


A Frightening Odor

The research team administered pain-inducing injections to mice and rats and monitored their facial grimaces, which is a measure of pain. When rodents are stressed, they grimace less, because their fight-or-flight response kicks in and mitigates discomfort. When a man was in the room, the rodents grimaced 35 percent less than when no one was in the room. However, there was no significant difference if a female was sitting in the room. To determine if rodents were reacting to scent and not something else, researchers placed T-shirts worn by either men and women in the cage with them. The critters showed the same gender-specific response. Further, they showed the same response when exposed to bedding used by male cats and dogs, as well as to synthetic versions of chemicals secreted from mens' armpits. “Our data suggest instead that an odor evoked by a cocktail of chemicals within the body secretions of isolated males (except cage mates) produce stress in rodents,” researchers wrote in their report, published Monday in the journal Nature Methods


Better Experiments

Producing replicable results is the standard that scientists strive for in their published studies. However the new study indicates that lab animals' biology and behavior might be affected not just by the experimental treatment but by the experimenters themselves. How the discovery is translated into better experimental methods is far from clear at this point. Still, Mogil told

, “This is a finding that’s going to make scientific research better, more reliable than it’s been before."

Photo: anyaivanova /Shutterstock

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2023 Kalmbach Media Co.