NCBI ROFL: The case of "Judge Nodd" and other sleeping judges--media, society, and judicial sleepiness.

Explore judicial sleepiness outcomes and their impact on the judicial system, including community and media responses.

Written byncbi rofl
| 1 min read
Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

"STUDY OBJECTIVES: Review cases of judicial sleepiness and subsequent outcomes, including media and community attitudes. DESIGN: Index case report and Internet search in English language at 2 recent time points. PARTICIPANTS: Index case and 14 other cases of judicial sleepiness reported on the Internet. MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative review of media and Internet reports. RESULTS: The index and other cases highlighted the role of the media seeking a punitive approach to occupational sleepiness, similar to that observed within the transport sector. In the index case, the judge's driver's license was withdrawn, despite official acknowledgement of effective treatment of sleep apnea. In 10 cases, judicial sleepiness resulted in a retrial and, in up to 5 cases, resulted in dismissal or retirement of the judge. In most cases, the cause of sleepiness was not determinable. CONCLUSION: Judicial sleepiness is not uncommon and is viewed negatively by the media, community, and judicial system. Active monitoring of the judiciary for sleepiness and sleep disorders is suggested."

Thanks to Winnie for today's ROFL!

Meet the Author

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe