skip to main content

NCBI ROFL: A scientific analysis of 400 YouTube videos of dogs chasing their tails.

Discover the real reasons behind canine tail-chasing, a behavior often misinterpreted as normal by pet owners.

Written byncbi rofl
| 2 min read
Follow on GoogleGoogle News Preferred Source
Placeholder image

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

A Vicious Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study of Canine Tail-Chasing and Human Responses to It, Using a Free Video-Sharing Website

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Figure 1. Screenshot of a video of a Golden Retriever chasing its tail on YouTube™.

"Tail-chasing is widely celebrated as normal canine behaviour in cultural references. However, all previous scientific studies of tail-chasing or ‘spinning’ have comprised small clinical populations of dogs with neurological, compulsive or other pathological conditions; most were ultimately euthanased. Thus, there is great disparity between scientific and public information on tail-chasing. I gathered data on the first large (n = 400), non-clinical tail-chasing population, made possible through a vast, free, online video repository, YouTube™. The demographics of this online population are described and discussed. Approximately one third of tail-chasing dogs showed clinical signs, including habitual (daily or ‘all the time’) or perseverative (difficult to distract) performance of the behaviour. These signs were observed across diverse breeds. Clinical signs appeared virtually unrecognised by the video owners and commenting viewers; laughter was recorded in 55% of videos, encouragement in 43%, and the commonest viewer descriptors were that the behaviour was ‘funny’ (46%) or ‘cute’ (42%). Habitual tail-chasers had 6.5+/−2.3 times the odds of being described as ‘Stupid’ than other dogs, and perseverative dogs were 6.8+/−2.1 times more frequently described as ‘Funny’ than distractible ones were. Compared with breed- and age-matched control videos, tail-chasing videos were significantly more often indoors and with a computer/television screen switched on. These findings highlight that tail-chasing is sometimes pathological, but can remain untreated, or even be encouraged, because of an assumption that it is ‘normal’ dog behaviour. The enormous viewing figures that YouTube™ attracts (mean+/−s.e. = 863+/−197 viewings per tail-chasing video) suggest that this perception will be further reinforced, without effective intervention." Bonus Table:

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Table 2. Human encouragement and responses to tail-chasing in dogs on YouTube™.

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Thanks to @InkfishEP for today's ROFL! Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Sleep disturbances in Disney animated films

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Behavioural responses of dogs to asymmetrical tail wagging of a robotic dog replica.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Introducing…the automatic LOLcat detector!

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ

!

Meet the Author

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe