More GSS, less speculation!

Understand why pundits should use GSS data to ground their opinions in facts rather than mere speculation. Discover the debate today!

Written byRazib Khan
| 1 min read
Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Long time readers know that one of my pet hobby-horses is to try and convince more pundits that they should use the GSS. Opinions based on opinions may be fun, but opinions based on facts may be useful. In general my appeals have fallen on deaf ears. But today I notice that Will Saletan is using GSS data to discussion the Todd Akin case. You may not agree with Saletan's take on the results, but at least he bothered to generate some results.

Meet the Author

Related Topics

More on Discover
Dinosaur Museum in New York
What Really Happened With the Destruction of the Dinosaur Museum in New York?
Antarctica
The First Women in Antarctica
Fingerprint evidence sheet
The First Criminal Conviction Based on Fingerprint Evidence
Forms of identification
Are We Running Out of ID Numbers?
Human and robot handshake
From Cats to Chatbots: Can Non-Humans and Pets Author Scientific Papers?
trace DNA
The Problem With Forensic Sciences
Autopsy
When Donating Your Body to Science Goes Wrong
Detective board
Serial Killers Have Rapidly Declined Since The 1980s
Team huddle
Study Probes How to Change Societal Behavior for the Better
Periodic table
The Search for the Perfect Periodic Table
Crowd
Controlling Crowds with Science
Saint Sophia Cathedral
Russian Invasion Imperils Ukrainian Heritage

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe