Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Mind

Will Neuroscience Have A "Manhattan Project"?

NeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticMarch 5, 2013 2:42 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

I've been reading a biography ofJ. Robert Oppenheimer, the 'father of the atomic bomb'. Oppenheimer was famously the scientific head of the Los Alamos laboratory, who as part of the Manhattan Project, invented and built the first atomic bombs, thus transforming the science of physics, as well as the world.

mushroom_brain.jpg

I wonder - will neuroscience ever have its own Manhattan Project? What I mean by this is, will advances in neuroscience ever reach the point that further advances, in certain directions, would become a matter of national security? Would a government ever feel the need to nationalize certain kinds of neuroscience research - giving researchers resources while taking away their freedom to work independently? Obama's plan to Map The Human Brain has been called a neuro-Manhattan Project, but that's hyperbole. The President is going to give neuroscientists money, but he's not commissioning them to work for the US government and the results of the research will be made available to scientists everywhere. The real Manhattan Project was top secret. So will neuroscience ever threaten to become as useful, or as dangerous, as nuclear physics has? Here's two scenarios where I can see this happening: If it ever becomes possible to put someone into a brain scanner and, without their consent, work out what they're thinking - to read minds, not just in a lab setting but in a really useful way - that would revolutionize intelligence, espionage and policing, perhaps as deeply as the atomic bomb revolutionized warfare. Such a technology would be of great interest to governments. Likewise, were it to become possible to directly manipulate someone's opinions, memories, or attitudes in such a way that the subject was subsequently unaware of this having happened (i.e. Inception or the Manchurian Candidate) - this would also be a matter of national security. Such things are impossible today. They might never be achievable, but they're not so far-fetched as to be unthinkable. Already we have made small steps along the way. I'd wager it will be decades at least before these technologies could be 'useful' but if ever it looks like it's about to happen, could neuroscientists find themselves conscripted in the same way physicists were 70 years ago?

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In