Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


When Science is a Family Matter

Neuroskeptic iconNeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticSeptember 13, 2015 7:52 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

A paper just published in American Psychologist has the unusual distinction of seemingly being written by four members of the same family. Opportunistic biases: Their origins, effects, and an integrated solution was authored by Jamie DeCoster, Erin A. Sparks, Jordan C. Sparks, Glenn G. Sparks and Cheri W. Sparks. Four Sparks!


In science it's not unusual to have couples who work together and collaborate in writing papers. Sometimes this is evident from the author list, if they're married and have matching names, and there are many other cases where the names differ. Parent-and-child or sibling-sibling teams are less common, but not unheard of. In neuroscience there's even a pair of identical twin neuroscientists, who write all of their papers together and have a shared CV. But it's very rare to see three members of the same family together in an author list, let alone four. Actually I'm not aware of any other cases, so the Sparks may be unique, although I'm not certain. Edit: they're not. Within seconds of me posting this, @manes pointed out a 1993 psycho-linguistics paper by four Bahricks! The DeCoster et al. paper (or should that be DeCoster et sparks?) discusses an issue that I've blogged about many times previously: 'opportunistic biases' in science, also known as researcher degrees of freedom or outcome reporting bias. The problem arises if researchers analyze the same data in multiple different ways, and then selectively report the most desirable results. In practice the most desired results are usually the lowest p-values, in which case the bias is known as 'p-hacking', but DeCoster et al. note that the problem is a general one that applies to other statistical paradigms, including Bayesian inference, even though they are p-value free:

Any analytic system where researchers can run multiple analyses and then choose what they want to report will have its results influenced by opportunistic biases.


DeCoster J, Sparks EA, Sparks JC, Sparks GG, & Sparks CW (2015). Opportunistic biases: Their origins, effects, and an integrated solution. The American Psychologist, 70 (6), 499-514 PMID: 26348333

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 50%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In