Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Mind

From "Observations" to "Data": The Changing Language of Science

NeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticMarch 19, 2016 7:32 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Today we hear a lot about scientific data - data sharing, data integrity, and Big Data, are all hot topics in science. Yet is science really about "data"? Did scientists in the past talk about it as much as we do? To find out, I ran some PubMed searches to find papers published in the last century, 1915 to 2015. I searched for "data" and for other alternative terms that can be used to refer to scientific findings. Here's a graph of the percentage of biomedical journal articles published each year, that have each certain word in the title.

pubmed.png

100 years ago, the term "data" was almost never seen in the titles of scientific articles. Instead, papers were commonly described as being "notes" or "observations". The term "results" was also used, but less than it is today. This first era lasted until the late 1940s. At this point, the word "results" became the most popular term. "Data" and "findings" also gained in popularity somewhat, while "notes" became almost extinct. "Data" became quite popular by the late 1950s, but its usage then peaked and declined. Finally, over the past few decades, we've seen the second rise of "data", which has been growing slowly but steadily since 1980, and has lately overtaken "results" as the most common word out of the ones I examined. "Observations" has been in decline since 1960 and is now very rare. What does this mean? My impression is that what we're seeing here is the gradual 'specialization' of science. In 1915, scientists seem to have preferred everyday terminology to describe their work. "Notes" and "Observations" are not specifically scientific terms. A historian, or a lawyer, or even a movie critic could use those words. In the second era, after WW2, the term "results" gained in popularity. This is still an everyday word, although it has some special connotations in science. Today, the rise of "data" seems to reflect a reversal in the relationship between science and the rest of the world. My impression is that "data" is being used more and more widely in normal discourse but this is a borrowing, so to speak, from science, whereas previously, science was borrowing from everyday life.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In