Matthew Chapman, writer and producer, writes an op-ed calling for presidential candidates to have a debate on scientific issues. It's an entirely reasonable piece, but if you stop to think about it, its publication raises two disturbing questions-- 1. Why should anyone have to plead for science to be a topic of discussion among presidential candidates? 2. Why did I find this piece on the Washington Post web site filed under a tab called "On Faith"--a section dedicated to religion? On Faith: Guest Voices: Call for a Presidential Debate on Science
It’s Come To This?
Matthew Chapman urges presidential candidates debate scientific issues to elevate crucial discussions in politics. Discover why it matters.
Written byCarl Zimmer
| 1 min read
More on Discover
Stay Curious
SubscribeTo The Magazine
Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.
Subscribe











