About the same time I was debating which computer was the best choice, I noticed the NYTimes had an interesting take on a similar question. Well sort of. My post at
Correlations is now up considering the presidential candidates' websites: Is Obama a Mac and Clinton a PC? PC is predicted to 'win the Electoral College by historic proportions with Mac perhaps carrying Vermont'. Well, these kind of loose comparisons are fun, and I suppose like a Sara Bareilles love song, you find meaning where you choose.
As for me, while I may be enamored with my Air, politics take a lot more depth and exploration...
We must LOOK CLOSER
. Charismatic and articulate is all well and good, but my candidate must have a plan, real substance, and a clear direction for our country. Demonstrate your strengths and don't just tell what would matter in your presidency, show me... And you've got my vote.
Still, these guys sure do remind me of the reps at the Boston Debate. Course in this case, Clinton's side outperformed Obama's. Read my full post at Correlationshere. So on this important day in our nation's trajectory, who's the most user friendly for our collective needs? Further, I submit this possible platform for Nader... What do readers think?
