skip to main content

Human Waste Could Help Make Stronger, More Sustainable Concrete

Learn how a team of researchers has turned human waste into biochar, a building material that could be used to make sustainable concrete.

Written byStephanie Edwards
| 3 min read
Follow on GoogleGoogle News Preferred Source
Concrete poured over steel reinforcement bars at a construction site, illustrating research into using treated human poop in concrete.
(Image Credit: Bowonpat Sakaew/Shutterstock)

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Once a toilet flushes, most of us would rather stop thinking about what happens next. At a treatment plant in southern India, though, that waste has a possible second act — becoming an ingredient in concrete.

The journey involves drying, intense heat, and grinding before anything reaches a concrete mixer. What emerges is biochar, a porous, carbon-rich material that could help builders use less cement while giving human waste somewhere useful to go.

A study in Scientific Reports investigated that possibility, finding that small substitutions could improve concrete’s strength. But the recipe requires restraint, and the material still has some important tests ahead.

How Human Waste Becomes Biochar for Concrete

Researchers used material from a fecal sludge treatment plant in Warangal, in India’s Telangana state. These facilities handle waste collected from septic tanks and sanitation systems.

To make the biochar, sludge was dried and heated to between 662 and 842 degrees Fahrenheit (350 to 450 degrees Celsius) under limited oxygen, with the peak temperature maintained for two hours. This process, called pyrolysis, transforms organic material into a carbon-rich solid. The resulting biochar was then ground and sieved.

The team replaced 5, 10, or 15 percent of the cement by weight with biochar and compared the concrete with conventional mixes. Cement is the binding ingredient in concrete, holding together materials such as sand and crushed stone. Replacing some of it changes the glue that keeps the whole mixture together.

Discover Magazine Logo

You have 1 more free article (1 of 2)

Have an account? log in

Subscribe today for full access and support our journalism.

checkmarkExplore All Options

Researchers tested how well the samples resisted crushing and bending, along with water absorption and the amount of accessible pore space. Separate mortar tests tracked shrinkage as the material dried.


Read More: These Microbes Could Turn Plastic and Plant Waste into Ingredients for Protein-Rich Cookies


Why a Little Biochar Can Strengthen Concrete

The 5 percent replacement mixes delivered the highest crushing and bending strengths across the tested curing periods of 28, 56, and 91 days. They also absorbed less water than the conventional mixes.

Concrete containing 10 percent biochar started more slowly, with strengths below the controls at 28 days, but continued to gain strength with longer curing. That makes timing an important part of evaluating the material’s performance.

Biochar’s tiny pores help explain these results. They can hold water during mixing and release it later, supporting the chemical reactions that allow cement to harden. Think of the particles as miniature water reservoirs distributed through the concrete.

Fine particles can also fill gaps, while silica in the biochar can contribute to reactions that form additional binding compounds.

Adding more, however, eventually undermined those benefits. At 15 percent replacement, strength suffered, as microscopic examination revealed numerous voids and cracks, suggesting that removing too much cement left a weaker internal structure.

What Sustainable Concrete Still Needs to Prove

Using less cement is appealing because its production consumes substantial energy and releases carbon dioxide. Turning sanitation waste into a construction ingredient could also create a useful destination for material that requires careful management.

Those potential benefits still need testing beyond controlled laboratory conditions. The researchers identify freezing and thawing, coastal salinity, and temperature extremes as areas for further investigation. Scaling up production also raises cost questions.

Environmental safety remains unfinished business, too. Although the team measured heavy metals in the materials, standardized testing of whether potentially toxic contaminants can leach out is planned for future research.


Read More: 2,000 Pairs of Buried Underwear Helped Measure Soil Health in This Unusual Experiment


Article Sources

Our writers at Discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article:

Meet the Author

  • Stephanie Edwards
    Stephanie Edwards is the Engagement Specialist at Discover Magazine, who manages all social media platforms and writes digital articles that focus on archaeology, the environment, and public health.View Full Profile

Related Topics

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe