How to Panic Weary Travelers

Explore the criticism of swine flu coverage and the media's misleading use of the White House report.

Written byKeith Kloor
| 1 min read
Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Kudos to Curtis Brainard over at The Observatory for his criticism of the media's latest round of "overly alarming" swine flu coverage, which was driven by the recent White House report. As Brainard notes,

The worst offender was perhaps USA Today. The White House report clearly states"”many times, and at one point in big, capital letters"”that the scenario it lays out is "a possibility, not a prediction." Yet, on Monday, the nation's mostly widely distributed newspaper decided to run the headline, "U.S. report predicts 30,000 to 90,000 deaths from H1N1 deaths."(The italics are mine.)

A few days ago I woke up to that USA Today story somewhere in Indiana, numb from my cross-country drive back to NY. But that headline sure did jolt me to attention. I fretted about Swine Flu the rest of the way home. Maybe if the Hampton Inn coffee was stronger I would have been more discerning.

Meet the Author

Related Topics

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe