Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Health

Why You Crave Sugary Foods Even if They Taste Like Crap

D-briefBy Breanna DraxlerMay 8, 2013 9:08 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

girl-eating-donuts-200x300.jpg

When, in a moment of weakness, you reach for that chocolate donut or bag of jelly beans, to all appearances your tastebuds are running the show. You imagine the snack's sweet taste; you might even salivate a little. If, on the other hand, these foods tasted like cardboard, you wouldn't be so tempted, right? Wrong. New research has found that it's not the taste of calorific foodstuffs that makes them enticing but rather their effects on our blood sugar. Our brain learns which foods are calorie-rich and drives us to seek them out. Researchers wanted to see precisely how these brain circuits worked, so they set up an experiment with 14 people and ten colorful drinks containing artificial sweetener. Participants tried and rated how good each drink tasted. The researchers then narrowed it down to the two drinks that all the participants found to be equally neutral tasting. Over the next four days, participants were given samples of the two colored drinks three times a day. Unbeknownst to the participants, though, there was one crucial difference in this part of the study: researchers had added 112.5 calories worth of maltodextrin (an odorless, tasteless carbohydrate) to one, while the other variety had zero calories. In order to see the effects of the calorie-rich versus calorie-free drinks, the researchers employed three tests: blood, brain and survey. Blood samples and brain scans showed how the participants' blood sugar levels and brain regions were reacting to the drinks, while surveys asked the participants to rate how sweet and likable they found the samples. The researchers found, unsurprisingly, that the calorific drinks increased glucose levels in the blood. More surprisingly, these drinks triggered more activity in the brain's reward center and were rated as more likeable even though participants didn't perceive them to be any sweeter. This likeability was a conditioned trait: while participants found the two drinks to be equally likable at the beginning of the study, they grew to like the calorific drinks more. This suggests that even though people couldn't taste a difference in the drinks, their brains had responded to the carbohydrate-rich drink's effects on their bodies by telling them it was more desirable. By the end of the four days, their brains had learned to anticipate and encourage the rewards of the calorific drink. The researchers published their results in Curent Biology last week. So it's not so much that our taste buds associate good taste with calories, then, but rather that our brains learn to associate a flavor with its ability to boost blood sugar. This is the first time scientists have been able to pull back the curtain and see that glucose metabolism is running this show. By identifying the neural circuits associated with craving sugar, researchers may be on track to figuring out which of these circuits are responsible for making some people more susceptible to weight gain.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In