Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Evolutionary genetics in Iceland; it's about the parameters

Gene ExpressionBy Razib KhanJune 24, 2008 1:18 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Another story about recent human evolution, this time, really recent. The paper in PLOS is A Drastic Reduction in the Life Span of Cystatin C L68Q Carriers Due to Life-Style Changes during the Last Two Centuries. A mouthful, but the authors are really good at explaining what they're finding and why it's important:

....The detrimental phenotypic impact of the L68Q mutation appears to have emerged in reaction to common life-style changes almost three centuries after the mutation occurred. We believe that this is the first report of phenotypic flexibility of a monogenic disease in reaction to life-style changes that fall within the normal range of behavior of a single population in the space of a few generations. Our results underline how single gene disorders with simple Mendelian inheritance can be affected by environmental factors, resulting in changed disease status.

It seems what happened is that when this mutation arose, on the order of 500 years ago in Iceland, its fitness implication was neutral. So one assumes that this gene spread via the standard dynamics of neutral evolution, possibly aided by small effective populations and inbreeding in pre-modern Iceland. The neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that a great deal of extant polymorphism will be due to these sort of random walk forces as fitness irrelevant mutants constantly emerge, go extinct, or on rare occasions substitute for the ancestral variant at a locus. Before 1800 the mutants for this gene had about the same lifespan as wild types. Though most neutral mutants go extinct there are enough mutations in the genetic background that a fair number will "float" up to appreciable frequencies. That seems to be what happened here. But then something does not exist in a vacuum, and the exogenous environmental parameters totally distorted the adaptive landscape. Instead of a case where the mutant and wild type were facing off on a flat surface the former now looked up to the latter on its fitness people. The population began to purify the gene pool of the now deleterious mutant through negative selection. This shouldn't be surprising. Many of the "diseases" of the modern world seem likely to have originally been less than lethal, perhaps even beneficial. Sickle cell is the most prominent case of a trait that was beneficial in one environment (malarial) being not so much in another (non-malarial). So with this simple environmental shift the mutant variant begins to be subjected to negative selection instead of persisting at an equilibrium frequency because of balancing dynamics (heterozygote advantage). One possible implication of these sorts of dynamics is that the greater the rate of environmental change the more "flipping" of the signs of selection coefficients there will be for any given allele. 10,000 years ago most of humanity started making the shift toward an agrarian lifestyles, and I suspect that might have resulted in various adaptations. Within the past few centuries humanity has begun to transition away from the agrarian past into a urban future, and that might mean that we live in a time of great evolutionary change. Related:ScienceDaily summary....

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 50%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In