Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Health

Editor's Note: Life and Death

DISCOVER's look at the complexity of organ harvesting may have been unsettling, but telling the truth is our #1 job.

corey.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Let me say up front: I am a registered organ donor. I joined the ranks just a few weeks ago when I renewed my driver’s license and discovered—much to my surprise—that I had forgotten to check the donor box when I got my first New York license years ago. This time I signed up without a moment’s hesitation. Organ transplants save thousands of lives in the United States every year, and if I had a fatal accident or disease I would certainly want my death to assist someone else’s life. Enlisting as a donor is one of the easiest forms of altruism around.

So it was with some trepidation that I agreed to publish Dick Teresi’s cover story, “The Beating Heart Donors.” Not because of its actual thesis, which I find fascinating and powerful, but because of the way the piece could be easily misconstrued. Many people already feel queasy about signing up to donate their organs; anything that increases those anxieties could have unfortunate consequences.

At the same time, Teresi’s article raises worthy concerns about how medical specialists treat people at the edge of death. Doctors routinely make heroic efforts to keep their patients alive. It’s entirely reasonable, then, to investigate how they define the moment when those efforts have failed, and how they treat patients who have technically crossed over. Nobody is suggesting that we end the practice of organ donation. If anything, it should benefit from assurances that a patient’s final stages in a hospital are treated with dignity.

In the end, my decision to print the article was an easy one. Both science and journalism are built on the premise that all meaningful questions are worth asking. Teresi’s answers are disturbing but far from complete. Nobody knows what, if anything, brain-dead patients experience, and none of them could plausibly return to consciousness to tell us. All we can do is read on and take one more step toward an information-based ethics—one that respects death while giving primacy to life.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In