Christopher O'Brien over at Northstate Science has the details. I am shocked, shocked, to hear that there is more to this story, including duplicitous park administration officials, after-the-fact massaging of decisions, and that PEER still hasn't apologized for being incredibly slimy about this. Try reading these posts for the background story.
Grand Canyon issue resolved… but not really
National Park Service clarifies concerns about duplicitous park administration officials and after-the-fact massaging of decisions.
Written byPhil Plait
| 1 min read
More on Discover
Stay Curious
SubscribeTo The Magazine
Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.
Subscribe












