On Twitter, some smart people I follow alerted me to a post titled, "2012: The year crazy and stupid went mainstream." It's by a writer named Bernie Mooney who defines himself as a "progressive contrarian." Here's how he begins his post:
I’ve always been of the mind that stupid should hurt, so 2012 was a hard one for the Contrarian. It was the year that crazy and stupid went mainstream, or at least when I first noticed it did. It was the year a manufactured issue, the safety of GMOs, came to the popular progressive imagination. Progressives embraced every crackpot and their theories. And none of them felt any pain due to their stupidity.
I know whereof he speaks, as I wrote a few pieces for Slate in recent months (see here and here) that drove the anti-GMO crowd barking mad. In one of them, I chided influential liberals and greens for trafficking in junk science and alarmist fears with respect to biotechnology. And like Mooney, once I really started paying attention to this issue, it blew my mind how much misinformation on GMOs the left has been peddling, and how it mostly gets ignored by liberal watchdogs. But here's the thing: Calling the anti-GMO left "crazy and stupid" misdiagnoses the problem. Fortunately, Mooney seems to understand this, since in the next breath he acknowledges that the fact-free hysteria of GMO opponents in 2012 " had nothing to do with a lack of intelligence, although there were some people who seemed downright unhinged." He then comes to a correct realization here:
After spending countless hours on this blog and comment boards trying to correct the errors, and set straight all the bogus information that was being peddled by the anti-GMO crowd, I discovered an alarming trend. The more I countered the nonsense with scientific peer-reviewed facts and evidence, the harder the anti-GMO crowd dug in their heels. It was like confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance and identity politics joined forces to create a gigantic mental disturbance field.
refers to the tendency of individuals to conform their beliefs about disputed matters of fact (e.g., whether global warming is a serious threat; whether the death penalty deters murder; whether gun control makes society more safe or less) to values that define their cultural identities.
So it's not a matter of people being stupid, as Dan Kahan et al found with climate change, for example. Again, Mooney gets this, as you'll see if you read his entire post. I'd suggest doing so just to appreciate his disappointment and disillusionment with his own liberal tribe. After wading through mounds of bad science that "kept popping up," and after discovering "the crackpots, fraud and charlatans," Mooney says he
became embarrassed as a progressive. These were my peeps. At first it was easy to chalk it up to a bunch of cranks and then I noticed that friends were parroting this misinformation. People I knew weren’t dumb. That’s when I realized the nonsense had hit the progressive mainstream.
Because of his newfound understanding of what he's up against, it's doubtful that Mooney would call any of his friends stupid or crazy. He likely knows that doing so would be a conversation stopper. Thus, I sense that he's venting his frustration. His post gives voice to an anguished lament that, on issues like genetically modified foods, vaccines, and alternative medicine, many science-minded liberals share.