Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Resilient Storylines on Drought and Climate

Collide-a-ScapeBy Keith KloorJuly 24, 2009 5:28 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The dominant framing of the water/drought issue in California is quite similar to that of the emerging climate change/developing world meme. In California, drought is simplistically blamed for the state's water woes and economic plight of farmers. Similarly, venerable authorities claim that climate change is responsible for 300,000 annual deaths and much misery in developing countries. Neither storyline is accurate. Critical, countervailing narratives by reputable scholars are offered but largely ignored--not because they are wrong but because they don't fit the dominant frame. So in this sense, I'd say that Peter Gleick is to California's supposed water/drought/misery connection as Roger Pielke Jr. is to the supposed climate change/disaster connection. Both have marshalled evidence and made arguments that challenge the respective storylines. No matter. The dominant, false storylines drive the debate in the media and in policy and political circles. Go figure. Hat tip for Gleick: Noah Buhayar at Environment Capital

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 50%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In