Environment

Nuclear Whiplash Journalism

Collide-a-ScapeBy Keith KloorMar 17, 2011 1:37 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

A commenter sums up the media's schizophrenic coverage of Japan's nuclear disaster (as communicated via expert opinion) :

"It's horrible!" "It's no big deal" "Worst thing Evah" "No, it's minor and under control" "Run for your lives!" "You're fine." You can actually see the frustration on the journalists faces. "Science" says everyone's dead and everyone's fine. Which is it?

Part of the reason for this confusion is that we're in uncharted territory with this nuclear meltdown story, and another part, I think, is the "whiplash" nature of journalism (something Andy Revkin has frequently talked about with respect to the climate beat), which is playing out now in a high alert, real-time, 24/7 manner. Those of you lost in what Clive Crook calls the media's "nuclear fog" can share his frustration here. He's trying to navigate his way to clarity, with mixed results.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month
Already a subscriber? Log In or Register
1 free articleSubscribe
Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Log In or Register
More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 70% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2021 Kalmbach Media Co.