A Strange Journey into the Minds of Vaccine Skeptics

Discover vital vaccine program advice to engage vaccine skeptical parents without confrontation or alienation. Click to learn more!

Written byChris Mooney
| 2 min read
Google NewsGoogle News Preferred Source

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Orac has a great post skewering an ambitious gambit over at Age of Autism: One Julie Obradovic lectures us there on how to actually save the vaccine program. Much of the advice has to do with accepting the incorrect premises of the vaccine skeptics, and humoring them. All of Orac's criticisms are on target, but I actually thought Obradovic wrote one thing worth listening to--at least if we take the more abstract point out of the biased context in which she introduces it. It is this:

Additionally, [vaccine skeptical parents] don't take kindly to propaganda or threats, and they most definitely don't like to be insulted. Telling them their choice is to go with the scientific side is juvenile in its approach, suggesting that any parent who researchers [sic] both sides of the debate, personally knows someone with a different experience, and disagrees with the one size fits all approach to vaccination is by default, non-scientific. Brilliant.

Well, they actually are unscientific when they do this. However, it probably is true that the confrontational, "you're clueless and irrational approach" is unlikely to unclog their minds or shatter their misconceptions. Why? Human beings just don't work that way. We have vast bodies of social science research showing that people fight hard to cling to their worldviews and belief systems--and when it comes to vaccine skepticism and denial, we're definitely dealing with a belief system, one rarely susceptible to rational refutation or dislodging. Does that mean we shouldn't refute anti-vax nonsense and set the record straight? No. But at the same time, we should be realistic about what such debunking can achieve. It certainly isn't going to lead to mass conversions on the other side of the aisle--not on an issue so polarized, where the vaccine skeptics have their own science to turn to and make themselves feel good and right and righteous. If changing minds is the goal, I'm pretty sure that something beyond debunking is going to be needed. Such is Obradovic's fairly unintentional insight.

Meet the Author

Related Topics

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe