I have always deeply admired the way Sam Harris argues a point with passion. I happen to disagree with him about Francis Collins, but I have to credit the force of Harris's take-no-prisoners approach with regard to all forms of "faith"--even when I think it goes too far. In the process of taking on Collins, Harris also argues against us and against Unscientific America--and for some time, I have been meaning to answer him on this. Life intervened until now; but I trust it is not too late. Harris quotes one of our book’s passages in which we argue that if we can depolarize the science versus religion battle, we can likely broaden public acceptance of evolution. It’s an argument, Harris says, “that, I fear, most people would accept.” Unlike many New Atheists, then, Harris implicitly realizes the obvious and, indeed, commonsensical force of our argument--even though he rejects it. ...
A Reply to Sam Harris Regarding Unscientific America
Sam Harris argues a point against faith and highlights the importance of critical thinking in the science versus religion debate.
More on Discover
Stay Curious
SubscribeTo The Magazine
Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.
Subscribe