A Dialogue on Framing, the F-Word, and the Future of ScienceBlogs: A Roadmap Forward

Well, it's Wednesday, and so far I've done twoposts--and gotten more than 170 comments--in the new "framing science" dialogue that I've sought to begin here. Let's briefly recap, so that I can then explain how I'll be moving forward. Meanwhile, Sheril wants to start weighing in, so expect her to do that later today. First, I began with my "framer culpa": Clearly, I have not managed to get these ideas across to many ScienceBlogs folks in a way that resonates. Rather, the subject has become polarized, and generated far more heat than light. I am in part to blame. Mistakes have been made--ironic communication mistakes. I'm now hoping to fix those. My original plan for doing so was to take you through a narrative of how this matter got so nasty over the course of a year--which I still plan to do. At the end of that process, I hope to have explored the dynamics and even the sociology of the divide between, say, a PZ Myers and a Matthew Nisbet--one, a funny and prolific blogger, the other, a sometimes-too-serious academic who, I think, has a bit of a tin ear for the blogosphere. I still plan on doing that; but in the meantime, yesterday we did a really helpful exercise (to me) in which I laid out the framing science "premises"--prior to their application to any specific issue--and then readers pointed out which premises they rejected. This was very illuminating to me. So I now also need to do a post or series of posts defending some of the premises (or agreeing to disagree about them). Finally, I ultimately wanted to get to some remarks about Expelled and the importance of civility on ScienceBlogs--but I'm still pretty far away from achieving that. So, in short, we have a long way to go, and there's no way my original plans will be achieved within the week. Nevertheless, I think progress has already been made, and there will be more. So please sit tight and enjoy the ride--and bear with me, as sometimes these posts take a long time to write. Nevertheless, we will end up, I think, at a better, calmer place than before--a common ground. But it could take a while to get there. In the meantime, I am going to let Sheril weigh in to defend one of my premises for me--premise six, I believe. She speaks out of her personal experience working on Capitol Hill, so I really think her perspective on the matter is invaluable. I hope you enjoy.

You have 1 more free article (1 of 2)

Have an account? log in

Subscribe today for full access and support our journalism.

Explore All Options